Bitcoin architecture evolution — Satoshi era v0.1 vs modern v27+ baseline
Cross-cutting architecture comparison across every subsystem: Satoshi's v0.1 (January 2009) side by side with modern Bitcoin Core v27+, with split diagrams and domain tables.
Keyword reference — entries that mention this term in body prose.
7 entries reference this keyword in body prose.
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto
Cross-cutting architecture comparison across every subsystem: Satoshi's v0.1 (January 2009) side by side with modern Bitcoin Core v27+, with split diagrams and domain tables.
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto
How Bitcoin's 21 million cap emerges from a geometric halving series, how block rewards transition from subsidy to fees, and how the incentive model sustains honest mining.
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto
Deep-dive into Bitcoin's transaction layer: UTXO lifecycle, transaction structure, Script evaluation, ECDSA and Schnorr signatures, SegWit, and Taproot.
Peter Todd ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto, Cullen Hoback, Amir Taaki, Wei Dai
A reply that read like the continuation of Satoshi's thought — and two days later, Satoshi went silent. The evidence for HBO's Peter Todd identification, weighed.
David A. Harding, Peter Todd ↔ Peter Todd, David A. Harding, Satoshi Nakamoto
BIP 125 formalized opt-in Replace-by-Fee (RBF), tracing directly to Satoshi's December 2010 BitcoinTalk replacement mechanism — the thread where Peter Todd made his second-ever forum post.
Cullen Hoback ↔ Peter Todd, Satoshi Nakamoto, Adam Back
HBO documentary Money Electric (Cullen Hoback) named Peter Todd as a Satoshi candidate, citing a 2010 BitcoinTalk reply about RBF and Todd's later BIP 125. Todd called the claim ludicrous.
Canadian cryptographer, Bitcoin Core developer. Proposed Replace-by-Fee, built OpenTimestamps. Joined BitcoinTalk as retep in Dec 2010. Named a Satoshi candidate by HBO in 2024 (denied).