Did Blockstream control Bitcoin? — the block-size war's biggest 'centralization' charge
Weighing the 'Blockstream controls Bitcoin' charge against the documentary record: where it comes from, and how each link in the chain holds up.
Entries tagged with this topic. Spans across types and sources — explore connections between people, events, and themes.
3 entries
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Gregory Maxwell, Adam Back, Pieter Wuille, Mike Hearn, Roger Ver, Jihan Wu, Satoshi Nakamoto
Weighing the 'Blockstream controls Bitcoin' charge against the documentary record: where it comes from, and how each link in the chain holds up.
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto, Jeff Garzik, Gavin Andresen, knightmb
Structural reading of the 2010-08-15 overflow incident — soft-fork rescue mechanics, why a 5-hour response was only achievable then, transaction-shape forensics, and the centralization paradox.
Jeff Garzik ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto, Gavin Andresen
An integer overflow (CVE-2010-5139) let Block 74638 create 184 billion BTC. Satoshi released a fix 5h 40m after discovery; the fixed chain overtook the bad one about 15 hours after the block.