Are altcoins built to go up in value? Checking twelve design documents
Twelve chains, sorted by what each one's issuance rule settles about the price of a single unit — and by how much of that price the rule never touches.
Keyword reference — entries that mention this term in body prose.
8 entries reference this keyword in body prose.
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Vitalik Buterin, Charlie Lee, Charles Hoskinson, Anatoly Yakovenko, Jeremy Allaire, Riccardo Spagni, Jed McCaleb, Jackson Palmer
Twelve chains, sorted by what each one's issuance rule settles about the price of a single unit — and by how much of that price the rule never touches.
James A. Donald ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto
The first person to answer the Bitcoin whitepaper, and a rare lexical match that made him the strongest lead of a fifteen-year investigation. The evidence, weighed.
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto
How Bitcoin's 21 million cap emerges from a geometric halving series, how block rewards transition from subsidy to fees, and how the incentive model sustains honest mining.
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto
How Bitcoin nodes agree on a single chain: SHA-256d proof of work, the difficulty adjustment algorithm, block validation rules, fork resolution, and probabilistic finality.
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto, Wei Dai, Adam Back
What Satoshi's design assumed about a fee-only future, and the documented debate over whether transaction fees alone can sustain proof-of-work security after the block subsidy ends around 2140.
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto, Jeff Garzik, Gavin Andresen, knightmb
Structural reading of the 2010-08-15 overflow incident — soft-fork rescue mechanics, why a 5-hour response was only achievable then, transaction-shape forensics, and the centralization paradox.
Bitcoin Institute ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto, Adam Back, Wei Dai
Bitcoin v0.1 reuses one cypherpunk primitive (PoW from Hashcash), borrows general CS components (Merkle trees, linked timestamping, ECDSA), and synthesizes the rest (UTXO, mining, 21M cap, P2P).
Cryptographer and libertarian commentator who was the first to publicly respond to Satoshi on the cryptography list (November 2, 2008). His scalability skepticism prompted key design clarifications.