Bitcoin Institute

Nick Szabo answers the mortgage comparison: bit gold minimizes trust (Unenumerated, April 2008)

Figures: Nick Szabo
Nick Szabo April 10, 2008 03:58 UTC

How certain are we that the person putting together the pool will not collude with the providers of the elements to include bits-gold pieces that are fakes?

It’s based on strong security, minimizing trust, in sharp contrast to mortgages where one must trust all the parties involved, depsite the often bad incentives (moral hazard) involved. The title registry, which holds the timestamp hash chains, solutions bits, etc. is public — supply cannot be hidden. An overview of the security protocols involved is here (http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2005/12/bit-gold.html), with links to further explanations.

Original external source

https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2008/04/bit-gold-markets.html
A comment on Szabo's post "Bit gold markets." The comment's timestamp, from the page's showComment link (comment id c1849969612922635346), is April 10, 2008, 03:58 UTC. It answers an anonymous comment posted at 03:13 UTC (c3933441326044366542), which had quoted the post's pooling and tranching passage and replied: "Hmmm... Sounds a bit like what they did in the mortgage market," then asked whether whoever assembles a pool could collude to include fakes, and whether every element would have to be checked. Like every comment on the thread, this one is labeled "Anonymous" on the live page; it answers as the author of the post and links to the bit gold post for the security protocols.