Re: Bitcoin Transfer - UI wording suggestion
Trammell admits the mislabeling was his error, suggests changing 'Received with' to 'Received payment to' for clarity, and draws a PayPal analogy as the closest parallel to multiple addresses.
Entries tagged with this topic. Spans across types and sources — explore connections between people, events, and themes.
6 entries
Dustin Trammell ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto
Trammell admits the mislabeling was his error, suggests changing 'Received with' to 'Received payment to' for clarity, and draws a PayPal analogy as the closest parallel to multiple addresses.
Satoshi Nakamoto ↔ Dustin Trammell
Satoshi explains the default address label is 'Your Address', suggests the mislabeling was a UI-driven user error, and acknowledges that per-payer receiving addresses have no real-world analogy.
Dustin Trammell ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto
Trammell realizes the confusing 'Satoshi' label was on his own receiving address, confirms he has multiple addresses at home, and asks if 'Satoshi' was the default since he doesn't recall setting it.
Satoshi Nakamoto ↔ Dustin Trammell
Satoshi explains the 'Satoshi' label came from Trammell's own address book, that transactions show the receiving address (not the sender), and recommends per-payer addresses to identify payers.
Dustin Trammell ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto
Trammell reports confusion about a 100 BTC transfer between his own two Bitcoin instances — the transaction details showed 'Satoshi' as a label, leading him to wonder if Satoshi had sent the coins.
Dustin Trammell ↔ Satoshi Nakamoto
Trammell reports confusion about a 100 BTC transfer between his own two Bitcoin instances — the transaction details showed 'Satoshi' as a label, leading him to wonder if Satoshi had sent the coins.