Re: (context post by user)

LHQuote from: Laszlo Hanyecz on July 08, 2010, 5:25:25 PM UTC

I don’t think you understood my point.

Ok, let’s elaborate It.

You wrote:

LHLaszlo Hanyecz

It is a lot easier to arrest and lock up the prominent bitcoin users than to manipulate the market.

But I write earlier:

UQuote from: user on July 07, 2010, 6:15:28 PM UTC

What you think if anyone intruder will buy up bitcoin currency and erase all binary data. This way can destroy bitcoin systems. Is btc network protected against that attack?

And If you try to lookup subject carefully you can find:

I don’t discuss in another attack that you indicated (I understand you idea: attack to system through people).

Ok. Follow next.

LHLaszlo Hanyecz

Maybe you don’t agree with my assessment of the situation but what you posted was far from constructive.

The main idea why I begin this thread:

UQuote from: user on July 07, 2010, 8:57:27 PM UTC

I seems, “truly” system must include mechanisms that protect self from any fraud activity.

LHLaszlo Hanyecz

In response to your original post, I don’t believe the situation you describe is a big risk.

But I think that It will be better if in design-time developers build mechanisms that decrease potential of fraudulent ability. And you?

Please, explain me if I am wrong. I want to understand you reflections.