Cool, I just hope you don’t take it the wrong way when guys like me and Gavin are trying to shoot holes in it.. I think we’re all here to see this thing develop and turn into something bigger but we’re also interested in finding ways to break it (so it can be fixed). It seems like you have done a great job covering the bases so far because you’ve been able to add features without breaking compatibility.
Re: Transactions and Scripts: DUP HASH160 ... EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG
Figures: Laszlo Hanyecz